it’s not because of what you think… saint laurent is getting a lot of heat from all fronts for their latest SS17 ads photographed by our beloved inez and vinoodh. they are not so terrible because of what they are trying to say… they are just terrible because of what they are not saying… but fashion was never the place to have a dialog (unless you speak to rei kawakubo, or martin margiela or maybe the crew at threeasfour). fashion originally made things that looked “different” or at least that was the plan at some point – even that has faded to a sea-of-sameness, draped-over the same pseudo celebrity suspects who are “famous for all the nothings they have done”. anthony vaccarello of saint laurent wasn’t trying to be demeaning to women, neither was inez and vinoodh, they made pictures that were beautifully composed but with out purpose or meaning or any thought. they say nothing about the brand or the industry, or women as a whole. they are meaningless fodder – you can reject them but no need to sensor them, because if we do that, then where do we stop? the sad part of all this, is that brands have an opportunity to stand for something beyond just selling their ‘stuff’… and every brand has to ask themselves, what do we stand for?
great idea, but unfortunately against the law… “paying influencers to promote your product (on social media, instagram, etc) without disclosure of such to the public can be considered a breach of federal trade commission guidelines.” case: lord and taylor vs federal trade commission…” in the heat of today’s social-media-frenzy, it is important to understand what laws apply, at least in the US market. this nugget was shared with us by our legal advisors during a recent project, and once again confirms that while many things appear simple, doing them… read more
jennifer lopez historic campaign for louis vuitton.
we are sure, many of you have uttered these very words. the opinion leaders at the tip of our very tall pyramid, have been carrying this sentiment for years now. but the answer, fortunately or unfortunately, is that “it ‘aint exactly over yet”. that said the faux-gloss of celebrity endorsements, be it for fragrances or fashion or food, are fading fast. this is the new-wave, even amongst the general market, where the tendency is moving towards reason and rational for loyalty and not just a celebrity name attached to some random brand. laundering uninspiring products and generically scented perfumes, backed by cliche adverting visuals (celebrity head-shots next to product A) was never the smart way to build a brand nor consumer loyalty. tempting as it was for its short term gains, read more
what a surprise to see hedi slimane’s updated (y)sl logo. as brilliant as hedi is and as much as we love his work, this was his one grave mistake on behalf of the brand. in this day and age, factory-styled faceless-identities are churned out by ‘art decorators’ where david yurman and donna karan are interchangeable logos. hedi, you had a beautiful and iconic ‘face’ designed by a.m. cassandre back in 1963 which became synonymous with the brand to work with, what happened? read more
uncharacteristically, marc jacobs “went with the pack” and nabbed pop star miley cyrus for his latest campaign. juergen teller supposedly and understandably refused to shoot miley, so instead david sims took hold of it. maybe it’s us, but it doesn’t quite jive with marc’s easy demeanor. perhaps, we should all stick to what we know.